The Supreme Court of Alabama declares frozen embryos to be “children”

On February 16, 2024, the Alabama Supreme Court delivered a groundbreaking ruling, marking a significant shift in the legal status of frozen embryos. This decision, stemming from wrongful death cases brought by three couples after the destruction of their frozen embryos, declares that under state law, these embryos can be recognized as children.

This ruling, which aligns with anti-abortion sentiments expressed in the Alabama Constitution, may dramatically reshape the landscape of fertility treatments within the state.

The cases in question originated from a distressing incident at a fertility clinic where frozen embryos were destroyed due to an accident. Leveraging an 1872 state law, the court, led by Justice Jay Mitchell, extended the definition of a “minor child” to include all unborn children, irregardless of their developmental stage or physical location.

This interpretation, according to Mitchell, is consistent with the court’s previous stance on fetuses during pregnancy under Alabama’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act.

The implications of this ruling are profound, particularly for the realm of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF). Traditionally, the courts have treated frozen embryos as property, not persons. However, this new classification raises numerous legal and ethical questions.

Barbara Collura, CEO of RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association, expressed her concerns, highlighting the anxiety this decision has triggered among individuals relying on IVF. The ruling could potentially disrupt existing and future fertility treatments, casting uncertainty on the ability to freeze, donate, or dispose of unused embryos.

The immediate reaction from the medical community has been one of caution and concern. Following the decision, some Alabama fertility clinics, heeding advice from associated hospitals, have paused IVF treatments.

This pause underscores the fear among healthcare providers of facing civil or criminal charges under the new legal framework. Dr. Paula Amato, president of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, emphasized the potential barriers to accessing state-of-the-art fertility care, which could leave many Alabamians without vital reproductive health services.

The personal impact of this decision is vividly illustrated by the story of Gabby Goidel, a 26-year-old woman pursuing IVF treatment in Alabama following three miscarriages. The timing of the court’s ruling, coinciding with the start of her treatment, underscores the immediate and distressing effects on individuals seeking reproductive assistance.

Goidel’s experience highlights the broader implications for women and couples facing similar challenges, emphasizing the personal toll of legal and regulatory changes on private lives.

The legal debate extends beyond the immediate parties involved in the wrongful death cases. The ruling has garnered attention and commentary from various stakeholders, including anti-abortion groups who have praised the decision for recognizing the value of life at all stages.

Conversely, Justice Greg Cook, in his dissent, argued that the ruling stretches the original intent of the 1872 law beyond recognition, potentially ending the practice of IVF in Alabama by classifying frozen embryos as children.

This Alabama Supreme Court decision is emblematic of a larger national conversation following the shifting landscape of abortion rights and reproductive health care in the United States. The addition of anti-abortion language to the Alabama Constitution in 2018, and the subsequent control states gained over abortion access in 2022, have set the stage for this contentious ruling.

The White House has responded, with press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre emphasizing the broader implications of the decision on reproductive rights and health care access across the country.

In conclusion, the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over reproductive rights and the legal status of embryos.

As legal, medical, and ethical discussions continue to unfold, the implications of this ruling will likely reverberate far beyond the borders of Alabama, influencing fertility treatments, reproductive health policies, and individual choices across the nation.

About the author

Author description olor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed pulvinar ligula augue, quis bibendum tellus scelerisque venenatis. Pellentesque porta nisi mi. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam risus elit, molestie 

Leave a Comment